So.
The Guardian is having a silly discussion in its letters column about whether the Quick Crossword, or, indeed, Arucaria, is becoming easier. We've had a sensible note about how the Monday cryptic is always a little easier, and altogether, not a lot of sense from the other correspondents.
I started to write to the paper about how I used to do the Quick on the P12 between Nunhead and Peckham Rye, but nowadays I can't always finish it before bedtime. Is this just age? And then I thought about how I am doing more of each Cryptic, whatever day it is.
Which means it isn't (necessarily) that I'm getting more senile.
And when I started the letter I had 2 clues unsolved in the Quick (2 out of 24 or 1/12) and one in the Cryptic (1/29), and as a result I was going to have a rant about the statistics.
But by the time I had finished drafting the letter I'd solved them all - so it all just made me seem smug. So I deleted it.
And anyway, none of the letters, written or considered, really touched on the puns, poetry or sheer joy of Arucaria's crosswords. The pleasure of solving.
So I had another reason not to send it in.
Finally, and for the record, I should just register that yesterday's absolutely lovely cryptic was as much fun as Arucaria's 50th celebration crossword last year.
Thursday, 2 April 2009
Guardian letter column
Labels:
april fool,
Araucaria,
cryptic crossword,
Guardian,
Letters,
Monkey Puzzle,
Quick,
san serriffe,
Ximines
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment